Enterprise Cloud Economics Index
Public Self Test
Founding Edition
Executive self-assessment · August 2026
0 / 15 answered
Answers save automatically on this device
Your ECEI 2026 enterprise profile
The founding edition provides directional profile bands, not peer percentiles. Meridian does not claim industry benchmarking until a governed respondent dataset exists.
| Dimension | Score | Unknown | Most likely interpretation | What to do next |
|---|
- Overall score
- —
- Total unknown answers
- 0
- Overall interpretation
- Incomplete
Important — a high score does not recommend any provider. It indicates stronger enterprise decision/operating discipline.
How the self-test works
Scoring treatment
| Response | Points |
|---|---|
| Yes | 100 |
| Mostly | 75 |
| Partly | 50 |
| No | 0 |
| Unknown | Excluded from score, counted as an evidence gap |
Profile bands
| Band | Most likely meaning | Not proof of | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80–100 | Strong, intentional discipline. | Superior technology or lower cost. | Review only material gaps / low-confidence areas. |
| 65–79 | Generally competitive with targeted gaps. | Peer superiority. | Address weakest dimension(s). |
| 50–64 | Material improvement opportunity. | Need to migrate. | Run deeper workload-level assessment. |
| Below 50 | Structural weakness, limited visibility or significant process gaps. | Any specific vendor is the answer. | Validate evidence and redesign decision process where warranted. |
2026 limitation: these bands are Meridian's founding interpretive framework, not statistical peer percentiles. Future editions will seek to add industry/geographic/size benchmarks only after ECEI has a governed, sufficiently representative respondent dataset.